Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1930

Jacobs v. Ehehalt

Jacobs v. Ehehalt
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided April 9, 1930
8 N.J. Misc. 266; 149 A. 758; 1930 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 250

Jacobs v. Ehehalt

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict for $5,000 and the defendant has a rule for new trial, contending that the damages are excessive.

Plaintiff had a broken fibula of the left leg; had it in a cast for six weeks; stiffness followed and there is some impairment of motion. He is a farmer seventy years old, does much of his own work and may have trouble in performing the heavier duties incident thereto. He had a medical bill of $249.

We think, however, that the verdict is excessive. If the plaintiff will accept the sum of $3,500 the rule will be discharged; otherwise it will be made absolute.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.