Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. Mayor of Allentown
Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. Mayor of Allentown
Opinion of the Court
This is an application for a writ of mandamus either alternative or peremptory, or in the alternative for a rule to show cause why such a writ should not be issued.
The allegations of the petition and accompanying affidavits tend to show that the borough of Allentown is the owner of certain poles, wires and other equipment constituting an electric light and power system in the borough of Allentown, in the county of Monmouth; that at a meeting of the borough council held on September 3d, 1929, the council adopted a resolution in pursuance of the provisions of section 2 of article 35 of the “Home Rule act” by which it determined that it was advisable to sell the electric light and power plant and system; that council directed the borough clerk to advertise for bids for the sale of the plant to be received by the borough council on the 11th day of October, 1929, at eight p. m:., and provided that each bid must be accompanied by a certified check upon a New Jersey bank or trust company for the sum of $5,000; that the borough clerk did so advertise and on the 11th day of October, 1929, the time and place fixed, the Public Service Electric and Gas Company (the relator) bid for the electric light plant in accordance with the terms of the resolution, offering to pay therefor the sum of $30,500; that after the bid was received an ordinance providing for the sale of the electric light and power plant and system to the Public Service Electric and Gas Company for the sum of $30,500, was introduced; that this ordinance was duly advertised for final passage at the meeting to be held on October 25th, 1929; that at the meeting of October 25th, 1929, after consideration, the ordinance was duly adopted, approved and duly advertised, and there
At the hearing in this court on such petition and affidavits of the relator, the respondent borough appeared by counsel and resisted the grant of any relief. Since there was no agreement as to the facts, but on the contrary it was insisted that the facts were not fully stated and some of those stated were in dispute, it seems to us the proper course, as matters now stand, is to grant an alternative writ, and it is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.