Boon Bros. v. Noonburg

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Boon Bros. v. Noonburg, 9 N.J. Misc. 138 (N.J. 1931)
153 A. 98; 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 464
Cukiam

Boon Bros. v. Noonburg

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cukiam.

An application was made by petition to compel obedience to a peremptory writ of mandamus issued out of and under the seal of the court on October 20th, 1930. Proceedings to punish for contempt for disobedience of a writ of mandamus are by attachment, rule to show cause, or other process, and the proceedings are governed by the rules applicable in contempt proceedings generally. 38 O. J. 939. The practice in this state is to issue and serve personally a rule to show cause why the respondent should not be attached for contempt. Brown v. Rahway, 53 N. J. L. 156, 161. See, also, Butler Co. v. Pittsburg, &c., 298 Pa. 347; 148 Atl. Rep. 504.

A rule to show cause will issue on petition filed.

Reference

Full Case Name
BOON BROTHERS, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, RELATOR v. JACOB NOONBURG. COLLECTOR OF TAXES OF THE CITY OF GARFIELD
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published