Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1931

Boon Bros. v. Noonburg

Boon Bros. v. Noonburg
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 21, 1931 · Cukiam
9 N.J. Misc. 138; 153 A. 98; 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 464

Boon Bros. v. Noonburg

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cukiam.

An application was made by petition to compel obedience to a peremptory writ of mandamus issued out of and under the seal of the court on October 20th, 1930. Proceedings to punish for contempt for disobedience of a writ of mandamus are by attachment, rule to show cause, or other process, and the proceedings are governed by the rules applicable in contempt proceedings generally. 38 O. J. 939. The practice in this state is to issue and serve personally a rule to show cause why the respondent should not be attached for contempt. Brown v. Rahway, 53 N. J. L. 156, 161. See, also, Butler Co. v. Pittsburg, &c., 298 Pa. 347; 148 Atl. Rep. 504.

A rule to show cause will issue on petition filed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.