Bateman v. Public Service Co-ordinated Transport
Bateman v. Public Service Co-ordinated Transport
Opinion of the Court
This suit was brought by the plaintiff to recover compensation for injuries received by her in the collision of an
The only contention made before us on the part of the Public Service Co-ordinated Transport is that the award of the jury is excessive. Our examination of the testimony, bearing upon the question of the character and seriousness of the injuries received by the plaintiff, satisfies us that this contention is justified by the proofs.
The Crosstown Transportation Company also attacks the verdict upon the ground of its excessiveness, and further contends that the proofs show that the collision was due entirely to the negligence of the driver of the Public Service Co-ordinated Transport bus and not to any negligence on the part of the driver of its own bus. We consider that, on the proofs submitted, the jury was not in error in finding that the collision was the result of the joint negligence of both drivers.
If the plaintiff will consent to a reduction of the verdict to $7,000, she may enter judgment for that amount. Otherwise the rules to show cause will be made absolute.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.