Goerke v. Hubeny

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Goerke v. Hubeny, 10 N.J. Misc. 34 (N.J. 1931)
157 A. 248; 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 32
Pee

Goerke v. Hubeny

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

This is defendant’s rule under which it is sought to set aside a verdict of $15,000 in favor of the plaintiff Edwin H. Bennett, for personal injuries, &c., received in an automobile collision that took place at the intersection of Cherry ' and Sayre streets, Elizabeth, on April 15th, 1929.

Two reasons are urged—•

1. The verdict is against the weight of the evidence.

2. The verdict is excessive.

We do not so find and the rule to show cause will be discharged, with costs.

Reference

Full Case Name
GEORGIANNA POWERS GOERKE v. FRANK HUBENY
Status
Published