Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1931

Goerke v. Hubeny

Goerke v. Hubeny
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided December 10, 1931 · Pee
10 N.J. Misc. 34; 157 A. 248; 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 32

Goerke v. Hubeny

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

This is defendant’s rule under which it is sought to set aside a verdict of $15,000 in favor of the plaintiff Edwin H. Bennett, for personal injuries, &c., received in an automobile collision that took place at the intersection of Cherry ' and Sayre streets, Elizabeth, on April 15th, 1929.

Two reasons are urged—•

1. The verdict is against the weight of the evidence.

2. The verdict is excessive.

We do not so find and the rule to show cause will be discharged, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.