Sprague v. Penrose
Sprague v. Penrose
162 A. 582; 109 N.J.L. 347; 1932 N.J. LEXIS 349
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Tbenchabd, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Bbogan, Van Busiciek, Kays, Deab, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.