Wagenaar v. Finkelman
Wagenaar v. Finkelman
162 A. 579; 109 N.J.L. 422; 1932 N.J. LEXIS 384
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court, ubisupra. *Page 423 For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.