Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1932

Hutchinson v. Conkling

Hutchinson v. Conkling
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 17, 1932 · PER CURIAM.
162 A. 755; 111 N.J. Eq. 471; 1932 N.J. LEXIS 757

Counsel

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Yice-Chancellor Bigelow, who filed the following opinion:, For the appellants, W. Beading Gebhardt., For the respondents, T. Girard Wharton.

Hutchinson v. Conkling

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow.

For affirmance — The Chancellob, Teenohaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Beogan, Van Buskiek, Kays, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.