Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1932

State ex rel. O'Connor v. Neidhammer

State ex rel. O'Connor v. Neidhammer
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 2, 1932
10 N.J. Misc. 318; 159 A. 90; 1932 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 240

State ex rel. O'Connor v. Neidhammer

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This rule to show cause seeks the consent to the filing of an information in the nature of a quo warranto to test the right of the defendant to the office of councilman of the borough of Fairview, in Bergen county.

We have carefully considered the record submitted and the reasons urged by relator, and they do not persuade us that the discretion of the court should be exercised in favor of granting the leave sought.

The rule to show cause is discharged, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.