Katz v. Zapela
Katz v. Zapela
163 A. 662; 110 N.J.L. 14; 1933 N.J. LEXIS 404
Katz v. Zapela
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam, in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 258.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.