Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933

Schaack v. J.A. Holmes Construction Company

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 5, 1933 · PER CURIAM.

163 A. 663; 110 N.J.L. 16; 1933 N.J. LEXIS 406

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 226.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.