Boeckel v. Orange Memorial Hospital
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- Schultz v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Newark (N.J. 1984)
- Collopy v. Newark Eye and Ear Infirmary (N.J. 1958)
- O'CONNELL v. State (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2000)
- Gray v. St. Cecilia's School (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1987)
- Heffelfinger v. Town of Morristown (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1985)
- Bixenman v. Christ Episcopal Church Parish House (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1979)
- Winters v. City of Jersey City (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1972)
- Lawlor v. Cloverleaf Memorial Park, Inc. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1969)
- Jacobson v. Atlantic City Hospital (3d Cir. 1968)
- Jacobson v. Atlantic City Hospital (3d Cir. 1968)
- Benton v. YMCA of Westfield (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)
- Lokar v. Church of the Sacred Heart (N.J. 1957)
- Rafferzeder Ex Rel. Rafferzeder v. Raleigh Fitkin, Memorial Hospital (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)
- RAFFERZEDER EX REL. RAFFERZEDER v. Raleigh, Etc., Memorial Hospital (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)
- Casper v. the Cooper Hospital (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1953)
- Jewell v. St. Peter's Parish (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)
- President & Directors of Georgetown College v. Hughes (D.C. Cir. 1942)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This appeal brings up a judgment in favor of the defendant below. By stipulation the case was tried without a jury before Judge Lawrence at the Monmouth Circuit on the record of the previous trial between the same parties of the same action. The first trial resulted in judgments in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendant obtained a rule to show cause which was made absolute by the Supreme Court in an opinion by Mr. Justice Case, and reported in 108 N. J. L. 453. Judge Lawrence decided this case upon the legal principles declared in that opinion. We think that was right, and the judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Case, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodusfe, Donges, Heiier, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.