Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933

Berry v. Silent Automatic Sales Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided September 27, 1933 · PER CURIAM.

168 A. 293; 111 N.J.L. 382; 1933 N.J. LEXIS 365

Counsel

For the respondent-appellant, John A. Matthews. For the petitioner-respondent, DeBaun Westervelt ( Jesse B. Leslie , of counsel).

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Van Buskiitk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.