Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933

Titus v. Wallick

Titus v. Wallick
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided September 27, 1933 · PER CURIAM.
168 A. 453; 114 N.J. Eq. 171; 1933 N.J. LEXIS 895

Counsel

Mr. Thomas G. Haight and Mr. Patrick H. Maley , for the appellant. Mr. Merritt Lane , for the respondents.

Titus v. Wallick

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Bigelow.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.