Columbia Insurance v. Artale
Columbia Insurance v. Artale
168 A. 304; 114 N.J. Eq. 268; 1933 N.J. LEXIS 906
Columbia Insurance v. Artale
Opinion of the Court
The decree will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion below.
We express no opinion upon the propriety of the award to appellant' Lieblich, of a lien on the proceeds of the sale of the mortgaged premises, for attorney’s services rendered to his co-appellants, Emanuel Artale and Mamie Artale. The latter have not raised the. question, and it is therefore not before us.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Yan Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — -Hone.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.