Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933

Columbia Insurance v. Artale

Columbia Insurance v. Artale
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided September 27, 1933 · PER CURIAM.
168 A. 304; 114 N.J. Eq. 268; 1933 N.J. LEXIS 906

Columbia Insurance v. Artale

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion below.

We express no opinion upon the propriety of the award to appellant' Lieblich, of a lien on the proceeds of the sale of the mortgaged premises, for attorney’s services rendered to his co-appellants, Emanuel Artale and Mamie Artale. The latter have not raised the. question, and it is therefore not before us.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Yan Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — -Hone.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.