Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933

Thomas v. Liondale Bleach, Dye & Print Works

Thomas v. Liondale Bleach, Dye & Print Works
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 23, 1933 · PER CURIAM.
164 A. 11; 110 N.J.L. 27; 1933 N.J. LEXIS 423

Thomas v. Liondale Bleach, Dye & Print Works

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 255.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Pabicee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Beogan, Hehee, Kays, Hetfield, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑