Thomas v. Liondale Bleach, Dye & Print Works
Thomas v. Liondale Bleach, Dye & Print Works
164 A. 11; 110 N.J.L. 27; 1933 N.J. LEXIS 423
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Federal Leather Co. v. Derensis (N.J. 1934)
- Federated Metals Corp. v. Boyko (N.J. 1933)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 255.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Pabicee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Beogan, Hehee, Kays, Hetfield, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.