Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933

Ballentine v. Ballentine

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 5, 1933 · PER CURIAM.

164 A. 5; 112 N.J. Eq. 222

Counsel

Mr. E. Garfield Gifford , for the appellant. Messrs. Kalisch Kalisch ( Mr. Samuel Kalisch, Jr. , of counsel), for the respondent.

*227 Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Advisory Master Reed.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Beogan, Heher, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.