Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1934

Downing v. Oxweld Acetylene Company

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided September 27, 1934 · PER CURIAM.

174 A. 507; 113 N.J.L. 399; 1934 N.J. LEXIS 373

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Peeskie, Yan Buskibk, Kays, Deae, JJ. 9.

For reversal — Case, Heteield, Wells, JJ. 3.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.