Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1934

Goldfarb v. Reicher

Goldfarb v. Reicher
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided September 27, 1934 · PER CURIAM.
174 A. 900; 113 N.J.L. 399; 1934 N.J. LEXIS 374
Goldfarb v. Reicher

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*400 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Tkenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.