Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1934

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided September 27, 1934 · PER CURIAM.

174 A. 758; 113 N.J.L. 506; 1934 N.J. LEXIS 405

Counsel

For the appellant, Ward McGinnis ( Peter J. McGinnis , of counsel). For the respondent, Dolan Dolan ( William A. Dolan , of counsel).

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam ini the Supreme Court.

*509 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Pbrskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.