This case presents much the same kind of a record as that disclosed in Naples v. Civil Service Commission of New Jersey, 113 N. J. L. 426, and for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in that case the judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Teenchaed, Pakkeb, Lloyd, Hehee, Peeskie, Yah Buskibk, Kays, Hetfield, Deab, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.