Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1935

Schantz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Schantz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided May 17, 1935 · PER CURIAM.
178 A. 768; 115 N.J.L. 174; 1935 N.J. LEXIS 284
Schantz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for ■ the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.

*175 For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Bodihe, Heher, Perskie, Yah Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.