State v. Cammarata
State v. Cammarata
176 A. 323; 114 N.J.L. 274; 1935 N.J. LEXIS 227
State v. Cammarata
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.