Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1935

Williams v. Harriott

Williams v. Harriott
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 9, 1935 · PER CURIAM.
180 A. 851; 115 N.J.L. 497; 1935 N.J. LEXIS 322

Counsel

For the appellant, Messrs. Collins Corbin. For the respondent, Nathan Rabinowitz.

Williams v. Harriott

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance β€”The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 13.

For reversal β€” None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.