McVickar v. Taylor

Supreme Court of New Jersey
McVickar v. Taylor, 187 A. 144 (N.J. 1936)
121 N.J. Eq. 111
Chiee-Justioe, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Wolfskeil, Rafferty, Cole, None

McVickar v. Taylor

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from a decree of the court of chancery in a foreclosure suit. The defendants admitted the execution and delivery of the bond and mortgage, but denied there was any consideration therefor, or that any money or thing of value was ever paid or received thereon.

The vice-chancellor found no merit in the defendants’ contention, and we think there was ample proof to support this conclusion.

The decree is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chiee-Justioe, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 14. For reversal — None.

Reference

Full Case Name
Edward S. J. McVickar Et Al., Complainants-Respondents, v. Kathryn Moore Taylor Et Al., Defendants-Appellants
Status
Published