Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1936

City of Hoboken v. State Board of Tax Appeals

City of Hoboken v. State Board of Tax Appeals
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 2, 1936 · PER CURIAM.
187 A. 164; 117 N.J.L. 119; 1936 N.J. LEXIS 321

City of Hoboken v. State Board of Tax Appeals

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court refusing to quash certain subpoenas requiring the appellants, who were members of the state board of tax appeals, to appear and testify as witnesses before a Supreme- Court commissioner under a rule to take depositions, which was allowed in certiorari proceedings.

We conclude that the appeal should be dismissed on the authority of In re Donald & Healy, 87 N. J. L. 691, wherein this court held that an appeal of this nature was an attempt to review the action of the Supreme Court with reference to its own process, and therefore such action was not appealable.

The appeal will be dismissed.

For dismissal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Heher, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 9.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.