Midland Corp. v. Levy
Midland Corp. v. Levy
184 A. 516; 120 N.J. Eq. 197; 1936 N.J. LEXIS 684
Midland Corp. v. Levy
Opinion of the Court
The decree in chancery is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion there filed. We elide therefrom, however, the parenthetical expression “who does not owe the debt” found near the top of page 79 following the name of defendant Beck.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Ohiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.