De Lotto v. Zipper
De Lotto v. Zipper
185 A. 54; 120 N.J. Eq. 339; 1936 N.J. LEXIS 706
De Lotto v. Zipper
Opinion of the Court
The bill of complaint filed in this cause was dismissed after hearing on the merits. It should have been dismissed on the ground that the court of chancery was without jurisdiction to entertain the bill, and this for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed by Mr. Justice Bodine in this court in the case of Red Oaks, Inc., v. Dorez, Inc., 120 N. J. Eq. 282.
Upon the latter ground the decree is affirmed.
For affirmance — Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Peeskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 10.
For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Heher, JJ. 2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.