Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1936

State v. Silverman

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 31, 1936 · PER CURIAM.

183 A. 178; 116 N.J.L. 242; 1936 N.J. LEXIS 241

Counsel

For the plaintiff in error, Perkins, Drewen Nugent. For the defendant in error, John J. Breslin.

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review heroin should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bobine, Heheb, Peeskie, Heteield, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil Raeeeety, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.