Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1936

Tarburton v. Hagemann

Tarburton v. Hagemann
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 20, 1936 · PER CURIAM.
187 A. 749; 117 N.J.L. 294; 1936 N.J. LEXIS 362

Tarburton v. Hagemann

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The proofs examined, it clearly appears that a factual question arose as to whether the plaintiff was an invitee at the time of his injuries. This factual question was submitted to the jury by the learned trial judge in a fair and well balanced charge. Timannus v. DeWitt, 109 N. J. L. 168.

The judgment under review is affirmed.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.