Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1936

Tams v. Abrams

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided April 24, 1936 · PER CURIAM.

185 A. 521; 120 N.J. Eq. 253; 1936 N.J. LEXIS 698

Counsel

Messrs. Schotland Schotland , for the defendant-appellant Paramount Investment Corporation. Messrs. Osborne, Cornish Scheck and Mr. Ervin S. Fulop , for the complainant-respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The pleadings and proofs in this case have been carefully examined. The conclusions of the vice-chancellor are abundantly supported by the evidence adduced.

The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.