Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1936

Woodruff v. Di Paolo

Woodruff v. Di Paolo
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 9, 1936
14 N.J. Misc. 786; 187 A. 135; 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 257

Woodruff v. Di Paolo

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

There was evidence tending to establish plaintiff’s right to recover the fees, costs and disbursements set forth in the *787state of demand; and the judgment must therefore be affirmed.

There was no basis for the claim made by defendant that he was denied the right to argue the factual questions at the conclusion of the taking of the proofs. While the judge indicated he would “not hear argument,” the right was not asserted by defendant, nor was the question raised by an appropriate exception.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.