Federal Trust Co. v. Ost
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF VICTOR VINCENT ALFIERI IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ANTOINETTE ALFIERI (P-002363-2011 AND P-000377-2013, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2019)
- Montclair Trust Company v. Lupher (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)
- De Benedictis v. De Benedictis (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)
- Williams v. Gooch (Miss. 1950)
- Glickenhaus v. Bradley (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949)
- Kinney v. Thomlinson (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949)
- Glover v. Reynolds (New Jersey Court of Chancery 1944)
- Barrett v. Barrett (New Jersey Court of Chancery 1943)
- Brooklyn Trust Co. v. Dais (New Jersey Court of Chancery 1937)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The subject-matter of the appeal is succinctly stated as follows in the brief for appellants (there was no oral argument) : “Vice-Chancellor Stein concluded that there was an intestacy as to the unitemized fifteen per cent., and a further intestacy as to the ten per cent, given to Louis Ost, Sr.” (who predeceased the testator). “Appellants contend (1) that there is no intestacy as to the unitemized fifteen per cent., and (2) that there is no intestacy as to the ten per cent, given to Louis Ost, Sr.” '
A careful reading and consideration of the ease and briefs, and of the opinions in the court of chancery, lead us to conclude that there was no error in the decree under review as regards the subject-matter of the appeal. The decree trill accordingly be affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.