Zerbey v. Thomas
Zerbey v. Thomas
192 A. 237; 122 N.J. Eq. 328; 1937 N.J. LEXIS 585
Zerbey v. Thomas
Opinion of the Court
The decree below was in favor of the defendant-respondent. It rests largely, if not wholly, upon findings of fact by the vice-chancellor. We have examined with care the record and are entirely satisfied that the decree was quite right, and it will be affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — -The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Hetfield, Deak, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffekty, Cole, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.