Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937

Sherman v. Sherman

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided April 30, 1937 · Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Woleskeil, Raeeerty, Cole, None

192 A. 59; 121 N.J. Eq. 614; 1937 N.J. LEXIS 564

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

•The pleadings and proofs have been carefully examined. It is apparent therefrom that the order appealed from vacating the preliminary restraint was a proper exercise of a sound judicial discretion.

The order is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 15. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.