Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937

Weining v. Sellitto

Weining v. Sellitto
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided April 30, 1937 · Chief-Justice, Trenohard, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Wolfskeil, Eafferty, Cole, Parker, Heher
192 A. 233; 121 N.J. Eq. 613; 1937 N.J. LEXIS 563

Weining v. Sellitto

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Our examination of the proofs taken in the court below convinces us that the order setting aside the decree pro confesso as against the infant Spenzierato, appointing a guardian and permitting an answer to be filed and awarding a counsel fee to the petitioner, was properly entered and it is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenohard, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Eafferty, Cole, JJ. 13. For reversal — Parker, Heher, JJ. 2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.