Winne v. Morrissey
Winne v. Morrissey
191 A. 840; 118 N.J.L. 195; 1937 N.J. LEXIS 297
Winne v. Morrissey
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court, except that, it appearing that the stipulated facts relate only to the judgment obtained against the surety company in the Municipal Court of New York City and the costs thereon, and nothing appearing therein touching the payment of attorneys’ fees and expenses by the surety company, we express no opinion on this point.
The judgment under review will be affirmed, with costs.
*196 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.