State v. Then
State v. Then
196 A. 740; 119 N.J.L. 429; 1938 N.J. LEXIS 297
State v. Then
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellob, Paekee, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.