Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1939

State v. Moresh

State v. Moresh
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 13, 1939 · PER CURIAM.
3 A.2d 638; 122 N.J.L. 77; 1939 N.J. LEXIS 299 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

For the State of New Jersey, appellant, David T. Wilentz , attorney-general ( Louis J. Cohen , assistant attorney-general, of counsel). For the respondent, William Boorstein ( Julius Lichtenstein , of counsel).

State v. Moresh

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Oliphant.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 6.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.