State v. Zeek
State v. Zeek
3 A.2d 574; 121 N.J.L. 584; 1939 N.J. LEXIS 280
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Zeek
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 11.
For reversal — -None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.