Fischman v. Joseph Fish Hat Co.
Fischman v. Joseph Fish Hat Co.
5 A.2d 785; 122 N.J.L. 428; 1939 N.J. LEXIS 331
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 431
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.