Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1939

Fischman v. Joseph Fish Hat Co.

Fischman v. Joseph Fish Hat Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided April 21, 1939 · PER CURIAM.
5 A.2d 785; 122 N.J.L. 428; 1939 N.J. LEXIS 331 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

For the appellant, Newton H. Porter, Jr. For the respondent, Michael Silver.

Fischman v. Joseph Fish Hat Co.

Opinion of the Court

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None. *Page 431

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.