Wilday v. Panas
Wilday v. Panas
3 A.2d 619; 122 N.J.L. 28; 1939 N.J. LEXIS 298
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion delivered per curiam by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, PIeteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.