Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1939

Wilday v. Panas

Wilday v. Panas
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 13, 1939 · PER CURIAM.
3 A.2d 619; 122 N.J.L. 28; 1939 N.J. LEXIS 298 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

For the appellant, Ward McGinnis. For the respondents, George K. Slingerland (by Maurice Bernstein ).

Wilday v. Panas

Opinion of the Court

*33 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion delivered per curiam by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, PIeteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.