Central R.R. Co. v. Simandl
Central R.R. Co. v. Simandl
4 A.2d 281; 125 N.J. Eq. 91; 1939 N.J. LEXIS 630
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Claus v. Brodhead (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1955)
- Clayton v. New Dreamland Roller Skating Rink (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We have carefully examined the pleadings and proofs in this case, the argument and briefs of counsel, and we concur in the conclusion of the learned vice-chancellor that a preliminary injunction should issue.
The- order appealed from is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.