Cotton v. Keen
Cotton v. Keen
3 A.2d 574; 121 N.J.L. 589; 1939 N.J. LEXIS 288
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Cotton v. Keen
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hehee, J. 1.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.