Sanford v. Kaercher
Sanford v. Kaercher
12 A.2d 676; 127 N.J. Eq. 277; 1940 N.J. LEXIS 610
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Sanford v. Kaercher
Opinion of the Court
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow and reported in 126 N. J. Eq. 391.
We find no abuse of discretion in the allowance of counsel fees and costs to be paid out of the John C. Marsh share of the Sarah W. Marsh estate.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Heteibld, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeertt, Hague, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Donges, J. 1.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.