Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1943

Deschamps v. L. Bamberger & Co.

Deschamps v. L. Bamberger & Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 8, 1943 · PER CURIAM.
30 A.2d 503; 129 N.J.L. 517; 1943 N.J. LEXIS 209 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Deschamps v. L. Bamberger & Co.

Opinion of the Court

*518 Per Curiam.

The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court, with the reservation, however, that we do not consider or pass upon the points argued in the briéf of appellant respecting alleged error committed by the trial court in certain rulings on evidence made during the course of the trial, and alleged error contained in the submission of the matter to the jury, for the reason that these points are not properly set forth in the grounds of appeal. Booth v. Keegan, 108 N. J. L. 538.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

For affirmance —Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Dear, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 8.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Case, Colie, Wells, JJ. 4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.