Williamsport Planing Mill Co. v. Bd. of Ed., Paterson
Williamsport Planing Mill Co. v. Bd. of Ed., Paterson
37 A.2d 43; 131 N.J.L. 486; 1944 N.J. LEXIS 217
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Williamsport Planing Mill Co. v. Bd. of Ed., Paterson
Opinion of the Court
The conclusions reached by the Supremo Court are sound and the judgment should be affirmed. We think that the Board of Education, which was not a party to Williamsport *487 Planing Mill Co. v. Maryland Casuatty Co., 129 N. J. L. 333, was not estopped by the last mentioned decision in the Supreme Court from arguing for a final acceptance but that the issue was nevertheless meritoriously decided adversely to the contention.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Porter, Dear, Wells, Raeeertv, Hague, Thompson. Dill, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Hetlee, Pbrskie, J,T. 2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.