Weiss v. Max
Weiss v. Max
40 A.2d 572; 136 N.J. Eq. 100; 1945 N.J. LEXIS 374
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Weiss v. Max
Opinion of the Court
The appellant brings this appeal because her bill to impose a trust in her favor was dismissed on grounds stated in the opinion below, and also because of lack of proof to sustain the contentions. A careful examination of the record and briefs satisfies us that the decree should be affirmed.
The decree is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Pbrskie, Porter, Colie, Wells, Rae-, eerty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversed — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.