Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1948

Cappadonna v. Passaic Motors, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided September 3, 1948 · PER CURIAM.

61 A.2d 282; 137 N.J.L. 661; 1948 N.J. LEXIS 345 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

19 later published cases cite this decision.

Auletta v. BERGEN CENTER FOR CHILD DEV. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2001)
Marcus v. Eastern Agricultural Ass'n, Inc. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1959)
Lesniewski v. W.B. Furze Corp. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1998)
Re/Max of New Jersey, Inc. v. Wausau Insurance Companies (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1997)
Sloan v. Luyando (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1997)
Kertesz v. Korsh (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1996)
Pollack v. Pino's Formal Wear (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1992)
Smith v. ETL ENTERPRISES (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1978)
Silagy v. STATE OF NJ AND COUNTY OF MERCER (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1968)
Petrone v. Kennedy (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1962)
Berkeyheiser v. Woolf (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1961)
Gross v. Pellicane (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1961)
Brower v. Rossmy (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1960)
Condon v. Smith (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1955)
Mahoney v. Nitroform Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1955)
Runk v. Rickenbacher Transportation Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)
Russell v. Torch Club (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1953)
Fitzpatrick v. Haberman (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)
Devone v. Newark Tidewater Terminal, Inc. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The questions are chiefly on the facts, and since there is supporting proof we are bound as to them by the Supreme Court decision. Pitchenick v. New York Folding Box Co., 129 N. J. L. 399; Suburban Land Improvement Co. v. Vailsburgh, 68 Id. 311. In so far as the dispute is of law we affirm, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Bodine filed in the Supreme Court.

The judgment below is affirmed.

For affirmance — Tub Chancellor, Chief Justice, Donges, Colie, Eastwood, Burling, Jacobs, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Scttettino, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.